English 390:
EPIC – Iliad, Odyssey, Aeneid Jonathan
Randle J309
TR
9:25-10:40 Office
Phone: 925-3269
Fall 2008, 3
hour lecture course E-mail:
randle@mc.edu
A version of this document in MS Word format is available here.
“In-depth
study in specials areas of literary inquiry. Topics and
readings will vary between offerings.
The course may be repeated for credit with the permission of the
department chair if course readings differ between sections” (2008-9 Undergraduate Catalog
150). Students should be advised
that not having completed the English departmental core requirement (101, 102,
211, 212, 213) before taking Eng 370 may cause
substantial difficulties in satisfactorily completing the assignments of the
course.
The student will:
·
Learn
to define “epic” and identify significant features and characteristics of the
epic genre
·
Learn
the main and secondary (“mid-level”) characters in the epic texts read in class
·
Be
able to describe, with attention to book divisions, the plot of each text read
for class
·
Understand the
importance of ‘myth,’ the ‘archetypal,’ ‘hero’ and ‘heroism’ in the class texts
·
Become aware of
the ways in which later authors and artists utilized material from the
Greco-Roman epic narratives
The English Department
adheres to
While it is not
designed as a major research course, and you should not therefore expect to
spend too much time on bibliographic projects, Eng 390 will require a
substantial amount of reading. I suspect
that you will need to spend at least two hours between every class period, in
preparation for the next period’s discussion; such preparation should include
reading the primary text (of course), highlighting any problematic areas which
you come across in your reading, and consulting secondary sources which I shall
make available to you. That said, I
realize that this course will appeal to a wide variety of students (not all of
whom will be English majors), and I will try to make this as enjoyable as
possible – which shouldn’t be too hard, after all, because these texts are
captivating to begin with.
As far as
assignments go, I envision two short essays (5-6 pages) – one on either the Iliad or the Odyssey, and one on the Aeneid – which must be turned in on the due dates listed
below in the course outline. In addition
to these two essays, you will need to write a short response paper (3-4 pages)
in which you identify and evaluate a “modern” (i.e., Medieval or later),
“artistic” version of any episode from any of the texts we will read. More information about each of these written
assignments will be forthcoming. In
addition to these papers, frequent reading quizzes will be given on the
assigned passages from our texts; these quizzes will be administered in the
first 10 minutes of class time, and they cannot be made up should you miss a
class period in which a quiz is given.
Finally, there will be an end-of-term exam, with both objective and
essay components.
Your final grade
will be determined by your score, out of 600 points, across the following
distribution:
Short essays 200 points (2 @ 100
points each)
Response Paper 50
Final Exam 200
I will use the following grading
scale to determine your scores on each assignment:
A = 93-100% 558-600
points
B = 85-92% 510-557
points
C= 75-84% 450-509
points
D= 65-74% 390-449
points
F= below 64% below
389 points
Homer, The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fagles.
Virgil, The Aeneid. Trans. Robert Fagles.
Attendance
The English Department
adheres to
“Class
attendance is an essential part of university education, and students are
expected to attend regularly and punctually all classes and laboratories for
which they are registered. Cumulative absences may result in a lowered grade or
loss of credit for the course. Tardiness
is also subject to penalty, as is any failure to complete
required class work on time. Although some specific requirements may vary
according to the nature and structure of the course, the following guidelines
summarize university policy:
1. Class attendance is required,
and accurate records are kept.
2. Students must not accumulate
excessive absences.
A student
receives a grade of F in a course immediately upon accumulating the following
number of absences, whether excused or unexcused:
[. . .]
8 in semester classes meeting 2
times per week
[. . .]
For lesser
numbers of absences, the student should expect a lowered grade in the course,
with the maximum penalty of one letter grade for each week of absences (in a
semester) or the equivalent.
Absence
Appeal. If a
student misses more than the number of class periods specified in university
policy and believes that there are reasonable explanations for the absences,
he/she may appeal the absences to the dean of the school in which the course is
being taught. Students may obtain a Student Absence Appeal Form from the office
of the appropriate dean.”
Late Paper Policy
The English Department has
established the following policy for late work submitted in upper-level and
graduate English courses:
No major papers or projects will be
accepted after the due date except in
the case of your hospitalization or the death of an immediate family member;
you may appeal your case, if necessary, to a departmental committee after
filling out an appeals form available from the department chair.
Grades for other assignments will be
reduced according to the following
schedule:
·
after time due
and up to 24 hours late: one letter grade;
·
after 24 hours
and up to 48 hours late: two letter
grades;
·
after 48 hours
and up to 72 hours late: three letter
grades;
·
after 72 hours, any paper turned in will be given an “F.”
Failure to turn in an assignment will result in a
grade of zero on that assignment.
The last day to
drop a course for the fall semester is 31 October.
TENTATIVE
COURSE SCHEDULE (subject to change; check online for any updates to the
schedule)
|
Week |
Title |
Date |
Topics of Discussion |
|
|
1 |
Introductions and
Beginnings |
Aug.
28 Thurs. |
Class
introduction; Syllabus review and expectations |
|
|
2 |
Laying Foundations:
Definition and Description |
Sept.
2 Tues. |
Oral
vs. Literary Primary
vs. Secondary Gods
vs. Men Individual
vs. National |
Aristotle,
from The Poetics C.S.
Lewis, from A Preface to |
|
4 Thurs. |
Situating
Homer and Virgil |
Knox,
Introduction to The Iliad [pages 3-64] (and his introductions to the Odyssey and Aeneid, if you’ve got the stomach for it) |
||
|
3 |
The Iliad |
9 Tues. |
· The Background of the
Trojan War · timę, kleos,
and the Wrath of Achilles |
Il
1-3 |
|
11 Thurs. |
· Gods and Men · Fathers and Sons · Husbands and Wives |
Il
4-6 |
||
|
4 |
16 Tues. |
· The Embassy to Achilles · timę and kleos
Revisited |
Il
7-9 |
|
|
18
Thurs. |
· aristeia:
a Warrior in the Spotlight |
Il
10-12 |
||
|
5 |
23 Tues. |
· The Gods: Fate and Glory? |
Il
13-15 |
|
|
25 Thurs. |
· The aristeia and Death of Patroclus · The Reaction of Achilles |
Il
16-18 |
||
|
6 |
30 Tues. |
· The Arming of Achilles · thnętoi : the Identity of Man |
Il
19-21 |
|
|
Oct.
2 Thurs. |
· Achilles and Hector |
Il
21-24 |
||
|
7 |
The Odyssey |
7 Tues. |
· The Odyssey is NOT Iliad, Part 2 · nostos and xenia |
Od 1-4 |
|
9 Thurs. |
· Odysseus and the Ladies |
Od 5-8 |
||
|
8 |
14 Tues. |
FALL RECESS; NO CLASS
MEETING |
|
|
|
16 Thurs. |
· Wanderings in retrospect · kleos in the Iliad and Odyssey · The Nekuia: Odysseus in the Underworld |
Od 9-12 |
||
|
9 |
21 Tues. |
· Homecoming, Part 1 · xenia Revisited |
Od 13-15 |
|
|
23 Thurs. |
· Fathers and Sons · Homecoming, Part 2
|
Od 16-18 |
||
|
10 |
28 Tues. |
· Recognitions and Revenge |
Od 19-21 |
|
|
30 Thurs. |
· The Nekuia Revisited · Resolution Paper 1 (Iliad and/or Odyssey) due today |
Od 22-24 |
||
|
11 |
The Aeneid |
Nov.
4 Tues. |
· In medias res · The Anxiety of Influence:
Homer and Virgil · Aeneas, furor and pietas |
Aen 1 |
|
6
Thurs. |
· Epic History: Aeneas’ Odyssey · Fathers and Sons |
Aen 2-3 |
||
|
12 |
11 Tues. |
· Epic Love: Aeneas and Dido · infelix Dido · Gender Roles |
Aen 4 |
|
|
13 Thurs. |
· Epic Death: Patronage and
Pietas · decensus ad infernos |
Aen 5-6 |
||
|
13 |
|